We have by now all seen this meme –
posters are getting the message all wrong. the message isn’t that if your are assaulted you have no recourse. its more a message that if you are assaulted report it immediatly, if not to the cops , to your parents. It may still be a he said / she said. but it will be much more credible. The message is not to wait 30 years to report what you can’t remember right, but to report it immediatly when you remember every detail.
If it is reported it they will be able to collect evidence that is essential in this kind of case. DNA is very important if raped or assaulted. This is the positive message that needs to get out there. No one is subject to violating your body in this manner or any other.
Please ladies, Do not make an assault on your person to be an embarrassment or shame. You were attacked and did not deserve it. On the other hand, Please do not bear false witness to destroy a man, as it only does wrong to all the other women out there that have actually been harmed.
I have seen a lot of responses to Dr Fords accusations. here is my opinion (not a trained anything, just life)
I am seeing a lot of how there are no real details. my explanation is that, Yes, something may have happened to her in the past, but, it’s not the way she is testifying. Some Psychobabble here.
You have a traumatic event happen early in your life. you pretty much block it in your conscious mind. Later in life as you “remember” the details of what happened, your mind tries to fill in the blanks. the mind does not like disorder and holes. So it reaches out for any clue as to what it needs to fill in the details. 30 years later, your talking about the incident, you cant recall enough detail to make it right in your mind so you take and fill in the blanks with any clues you can get. you had a date that you got drunk with and he groped you, and you didn’t want to go that far, but because you liked that guy, your mind says no it wasn’t him. at this point you reach out in your subconscious to make it someone you don’t like. then because you can’t remember some other details your mind makes up a story based on your life experiences. You have gone to a lot of parties, and have fantasized about certain things. the mind says,ok, lets use all that to fill in the missing pieces.
So now you have gone from a date grope, to an assault at a party from a figure you would love to destroy. Don’t you love how the mind works? Is this scenario any less plausible than what you have heard from all the testimony and document releases?
Comments as always welcome.
Here is one for all you guys just for fun. While scanning around the net I’ve read a bunch of weird stuff. Putting it all together it gets fun, and makes me think are we at war? Let me walk you through some of the different items I’ve seen.
Approximately two weeks ago I saw on the net where the CIA and NSA satellites were taken off-line .okay that’s nothing in unto itself.
Next event, five hurricanes develop off the African coast. Oe of these develops into a category four hurricane that is named Florance.
Then about a week ago there was an apparent takeover of six or seven solar observatories .this was done by the federal Bureau of investigation .there was talk of them reworking the antenna.
Meanwhile, flo is still coming across as a cat for in very warm water the water any Atlantic is at approximately 85° which is great for keeping hurricanes going and making them more.
Now sometime during this period there was a reported let’s call it a heartbeat signal detected that was abnormal for the normal signals in the earth.
Well, long about Wednesday ,the weatherman said something strange,. Tey said the eye wall was reforming. This is something strange, I’ve never heard of it before. Watching all the winds aloft and the ocean temperatures and everything else I didn’t notice anything strange. But all of a sudden a category four hurricane is Daniel category two .strange. Did our president make a call over to the CIA and tell them to stop this hurricane ?we may never know. Just one of the strangeness.
Could we be at war and not know it ?
And as a postscript, what happened up in Massachusetts? Was that a hack attack? reminds me of scenes of Bruce Willis and Die hard 2.
Oh well like I said Mrs. Busby Funk piece putting stuff together that on its own means nothing and put together means what ? have fun and enjoy.
to resume approximately 2 weeks ago approximately approximately 2 weeks ago approximately 2 weeks ago approximately 2 weeks ago approximately 2 weeks ago approximately approximately approximately approximately approximately approximatelyAproximatly approximately AAAAAApppp
I was having a discussion in one of the groups today, and the question of the First Amendment came up. This was after we were talking about how SCOTUS created an unconstitutional law. I was asked how can Scotus create a law. I answered back by ruling on a subject that there are no real current laws on. He asked me how that can be. I brought up the religious freedom stuff. And that by making the ruling they did, they created a precedent that other courts have to follow.
He asked me for specifics, so I gave him the 1948 case of McCollum versus board of ed. and then I explained on how three more cases were based on McCollum. I explained to him, in my opinion, Scotus had overextended the First Amendment and created a law that wasn’t there. The First Amendment is very clear in its language it specifies exactly who it’s talking about. It says Congress shall not, not to state, not the people. I also brought up how the 10th amendment gives the power to the states and the people for anything that is not in the Constitution. There was the usual back-and-forth of very serious discussion, and thankfully none of the two-year-old acting out stuff.
I don’t think he got it, but, that’s okay. It will give him something to think about later.
What about you, what do you think about how the Supreme Court created a law that wasn’t even there, unconstitutionally? This is a serious question and would appreciate serious responses. Thank you.
so, I have been reading a lot of posts from a lot of people responding to my posts and others. I have noticed something. It’s a little something, but something that irks my craw. It seems like the left finds it perfectly ok to break any and all laws and rules, just so long as they can say it’s “for the good of the people”. Isn’t that lovely.
Yup, that’s right, they don’t care about the law. It’s ok If I break in to your store to feed my family. It’s ok to tell a state secret if it shows that you are going against my views. This is the thinking of the left. Lawlessness as long as it benefits them. This saddens me that in this day and age we can have adults displaying this attitude that is seen by our youth and emulated. Where did we go wrong? Was it the participation trophies? I wish I knew. But it is obvious that we can not let it go on. but how to stop it before our society and country goes to hell?
This post is marked group confidential. Do not discuss or release any information in it.
The sky is blue. A fun way to think about this.
Here in a fun way I am going to show you just how bad a confidentiality agreement is. This is just a way to think about things that seems far-fetched, but is the way it is done.
Suppose I get a security clearance, I am shown a confidential memo that says the sky is blue. Now it is in normal conversation somebody asked me what color is the sky, I cannot say that the sky is blue. Why? Well that would be revealing information I got from a confidential document. Now how could you say that it was from the confidential document or could not be from confidential document? That is the question. Now, where it may be common knowledge that the sky is blue. I cannot say that the sky is blue because I am under a confidentiality agreement to not reveal any information I have received from the confidential documents. Sounds silly doesn’t it? But that is what we are left with when we sign or agree to a confidential agreement. So since I have marked this post group confidential, you are not ever able to say that the sky is blue again.
Does this have any national secrets in it? There is no way for you to know. It could be a password it could be a pass phrase, It could be anything. You have no way of knowing why it has been marked confidential. All you can know is it is confidential and you are supposed to respect that the originator has reason for the confidentiality.
Have fun and as always have a great day. PS the sky is gray. LOL.
I want to congratulate Mr Booker, really I do. He is a magician. He has mostly been able to use slight of hand to mostly confuse and redirect the majority of people. You see, He was able to make a grandstand play with that whole sparticus stuff. That threw everyone off of the real facts. Well I did say mostly. there were a few of us that were watching the right hand while the left hand was distracting everyone else. You may be interested in what the right hand was actually doing.
The issue is not the data dump on thurs. that was declassified on thursday at 3 am by Mr Lee’s staff. The issue is ,while questioning the judge on weds. night he read into the public record in open hearing a document marked classified. He was warned about it. for those that want proof I offer this video and the following time marks –
Booker starts at about 10:56, at about 11:02 he reads the classified document, at about 11:18 Senator Lee tells us that that doc was classified.
So to you Mr Booker, I say great performance, but like on the Penn and Teller show, sorry you did not fool us. And for that reason I am calling for your ouster from the senate. You see, we can not afford to have a man that would release trusted information to our enemies. And that sir is exactly what you have shown us you would do. If you have any semblance of honor you would resign right now.
I was watching the news again, (boring), and saw a piece about how Los Angeles is now deploying full body scanners. This bothers me. (not that I will ever be in California). The fact that they are now able to do a search without permission going against our Constitutional rights and get away with it?
4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
How are we allowing a non invasive search with out a warrant? I realize this is in Ca. and they want socialism and damned the constitution, but, this could go other places. Ever since 9/11 and before, we have been complacent and allowed for the slow erosion of our rights under the guise of security.
As any lawsuit that I might bring from my home state will be thrown out for reasons that I don’t live in the state, I am asking somebody in that state that is of thoughtful mind to file suit against this violation of our Constitutional Rights before it can spread.
What is next? A microphone hooked up to a computer in all public places to gather our private conversations? (who needs a warrant for a cell phone tap, just turn on the mic and listen in?) and then charge us with some inane crime just for saying something that was just a thought and never an action?
hmmm, how fair is this? the NM muslim that was training kids to shoot up schools, that had at least 1 childs body found on the compound, has been released on 20k$ bail. all the while a guy that left a dog to drown gets no bail and has to remain locked up until his trial.
To the leaders of the Church. I ask has the church abandoned God?
I ask this based on recent letters from the heads of the various churches. In their letters they have left us to believe that God has been declared imperfect, and that the teachings of the Bible are false. In the quest to keep the church afloat they have become more interested in the almighty dollar than in the souls of their parish. Yes we want those with sin,(which is all of us) to come to the word of God. It is up to all of us to take in the sinner and show them the way to the Light. But the church is now saying that we should just accept the ways of the sinner and allow for them not to change.
In this world of the politically correct, the Church has given in, instead of being the sturdy foundation. Please remember the tale of the 3 houses and how the house built of stone withstood all. I fear that this version of the Church has been built of straw.
(one who feels that I have not left the Church , but the Church has left me)
Yours in Christ and God’s love