Yes, here is another of those, saw a post and wanted to see something and found out another, posts from me.
Was looking thru the US Constitution again, and found something kinda funny. I will post the relevant articles below, but for now here is a weird thing.
Did you know that the Constitution says that representatives will be apportioned based on the number of whole persons(have to check on the meaning of that later) and that if any man is found to be able to not vote due to crimes and such, the apportionment will be decreased by that number of men not able to vote.
Note it says any man not woman, even the 19th only says that women can vote not that they are counted for representation. I have checked everything that I could and found nothing that gives any change in status for counting representation. So you can have 25k men incarcerated and that would change the number of representatives, but having 1 million women in jail would change nothing.
Here is the 14th amendment (replacing text from earlier in the Constitution)
2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
and now the 19th
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
I have been reading a lot of stuff here, and one thing that I can not seem to get my mind around is why are we and the media so outraged over Mr Kashoggi’s killing? The MSM is trying to make it like he was a US citizen, from what I have seen, he at best had a visa for the US.
Next we have the fact that Turkey is the one that gave us the info. How much do we trust Turkey? They gave up audio recordings from inside the embassy? What country gives up the fact that they are bugging a foreign embassy? The Video shows him going in the embassy. ok that’s normal stuff, all countries monitor the outside of embassies. I mean how many cameras are out there anyway?.
Then they say they had proof that Kashoggi was murdered, dismembered, and disposed of?
Now we are to be all aghast and take measures that would bring us to war? Over a Non-citizen that the only proof is from Turkey? And to top it off there has been no real independent proof that I know of(ok cia had a report but can we trust them?).
So why do we need to be this outraged? That we would dump our relationship with a country and call for an overthrow of a foreign govt?
What is the end game here? What is the gain for Turkey by promoting this? I think it is time we take a minute, Think, stop reacting emotionally, and try to see the end game and maybe some truth?
Can anyone provide any proof, or truth as to why we need to be so outraged over this supposed action by the Saudi’s? This whole thing just doe not sound right.
We have by now all seen this meme –
posters are getting the message all wrong. the message isn’t that if your are assaulted you have no recourse. its more a message that if you are assaulted report it immediatly, if not to the cops , to your parents. It may still be a he said / she said. but it will be much more credible. The message is not to wait 30 years to report what you can’t remember right, but to report it immediatly when you remember every detail.
If it is reported it they will be able to collect evidence that is essential in this kind of case. DNA is very important if raped or assaulted. This is the positive message that needs to get out there. No one is subject to violating your body in this manner or any other.
Please ladies, Do not make an assault on your person to be an embarrassment or shame. You were attacked and did not deserve it. On the other hand, Please do not bear false witness to destroy a man, as it only does wrong to all the other women out there that have actually been harmed.
Here is one for all you guys just for fun. While scanning around the net I’ve read a bunch of weird stuff. Putting it all together it gets fun, and makes me think are we at war? Let me walk you through some of the different items I’ve seen.
Approximately two weeks ago I saw on the net where the CIA and NSA satellites were taken off-line .okay that’s nothing in unto itself.
Next event, five hurricanes develop off the African coast. Oe of these develops into a category four hurricane that is named Florance.
Then about a week ago there was an apparent takeover of six or seven solar observatories .this was done by the federal Bureau of investigation .there was talk of them reworking the antenna.
Meanwhile, flo is still coming across as a cat for in very warm water the water any Atlantic is at approximately 85° which is great for keeping hurricanes going and making them more.
Now sometime during this period there was a reported let’s call it a heartbeat signal detected that was abnormal for the normal signals in the earth.
Well, long about Wednesday ,the weatherman said something strange,. Tey said the eye wall was reforming. This is something strange, I’ve never heard of it before. Watching all the winds aloft and the ocean temperatures and everything else I didn’t notice anything strange. But all of a sudden a category four hurricane is Daniel category two .strange. Did our president make a call over to the CIA and tell them to stop this hurricane ?we may never know. Just one of the strangeness.
Could we be at war and not know it ?
And as a postscript, what happened up in Massachusetts? Was that a hack attack? reminds me of scenes of Bruce Willis and Die hard 2.
Oh well like I said Mrs. Busby Funk piece putting stuff together that on its own means nothing and put together means what ? have fun and enjoy.
I was having a discussion in one of the groups today, and the question of the First Amendment came up. This was after we were talking about how SCOTUS created an unconstitutional law. I was asked how can Scotus create a law. I answered back by ruling on a subject that there are no real current laws on. He asked me how that can be. I brought up the religious freedom stuff. And that by making the ruling they did, they created a precedent that other courts have to follow.
He asked me for specifics, so I gave him the 1948 case of McCollum versus board of ed. and then I explained on how three more cases were based on McCollum. I explained to him, in my opinion, Scotus had overextended the First Amendment and created a law that wasn’t there. The First Amendment is very clear in its language it specifies exactly who it’s talking about. It says Congress shall not, not to state, not the people. I also brought up how the 10th amendment gives the power to the states and the people for anything that is not in the Constitution. There was the usual back-and-forth of very serious discussion, and thankfully none of the two-year-old acting out stuff.
I don’t think he got it, but, that’s okay. It will give him something to think about later.
What about you, what do you think about how the Supreme Court created a law that wasn’t even there, unconstitutionally? This is a serious question and would appreciate serious responses. Thank you.
so, I have been reading a lot of posts from a lot of people responding to my posts and others. I have noticed something. It’s a little something, but something that irks my craw. It seems like the left finds it perfectly ok to break any and all laws and rules, just so long as they can say it’s “for the good of the people”. Isn’t that lovely.
Yup, that’s right, they don’t care about the law. It’s ok If I break in to your store to feed my family. It’s ok to tell a state secret if it shows that you are going against my views. This is the thinking of the left. Lawlessness as long as it benefits them. This saddens me that in this day and age we can have adults displaying this attitude that is seen by our youth and emulated. Where did we go wrong? Was it the participation trophies? I wish I knew. But it is obvious that we can not let it go on. but how to stop it before our society and country goes to hell?
This post is marked group confidential. Do not discuss or release any information in it.
The sky is blue. A fun way to think about this.
Here in a fun way I am going to show you just how bad a confidentiality agreement is. This is just a way to think about things that seems far-fetched, but is the way it is done.
Suppose I get a security clearance, I am shown a confidential memo that says the sky is blue. Now it is in normal conversation somebody asked me what color is the sky, I cannot say that the sky is blue. Why? Well that would be revealing information I got from a confidential document. Now how could you say that it was from the confidential document or could not be from confidential document? That is the question. Now, where it may be common knowledge that the sky is blue. I cannot say that the sky is blue because I am under a confidentiality agreement to not reveal any information I have received from the confidential documents. Sounds silly doesn’t it? But that is what we are left with when we sign or agree to a confidential agreement. So since I have marked this post group confidential, you are not ever able to say that the sky is blue again.
Does this have any national secrets in it? There is no way for you to know. It could be a password it could be a pass phrase, It could be anything. You have no way of knowing why it has been marked confidential. All you can know is it is confidential and you are supposed to respect that the originator has reason for the confidentiality.
Have fun and as always have a great day. PS the sky is gray. LOL.
To the leaders of the Church. I ask has the church abandoned God?
I ask this based on recent letters from the heads of the various churches. In their letters they have left us to believe that God has been declared imperfect, and that the teachings of the Bible are false. In the quest to keep the church afloat they have become more interested in the almighty dollar than in the souls of their parish. Yes we want those with sin,(which is all of us) to come to the word of God. It is up to all of us to take in the sinner and show them the way to the Light. But the church is now saying that we should just accept the ways of the sinner and allow for them not to change.
In this world of the politically correct, the Church has given in, instead of being the sturdy foundation. Please remember the tale of the 3 houses and how the house built of stone withstood all. I fear that this version of the Church has been built of straw.
(one who feels that I have not left the Church , but the Church has left me)
Yours in Christ and God’s love
[The LORD said] “Woe to the worthless shepherd, who deserts the flock! May the sword strike his arm and his right eye! May his arm be completely withered, his right eye totally blinded!”
I am sitting here watching the feeds that I watch on tv,fb,twitter et al. . And am thinking to myself after seeing everyone on the democratic side trying to tell Mr Trump how to do the job he is going to be doing. They are trying to get him to complete Mr Obama’s legacy and push their liberal agenda on him. Then thinking to myself, Boy are they going to be surprised when he does none of what they tell him to do and I am expecting them to cry like babies. Gentlemen let me ask you this, let the current administration finnish, then let Mr Trump rise to the occasion, as he will. Right now I bet he is just sitting back listening to all these idiots and chuckeling.